Warning Against the Use of Anti-Inflammatory Medicines to Cure COVID-19: Building Castles in the Air

A recent article focused its attention on the supposed relationship between chronic pathologies (hypertension and diabetes mellitus) and COVID-19 infection and their pharmacological treatment. The initial assumption is based on two recent papers reporting the clinical experience in China, during the dramatic epidemic now becoming a pandemic. Both articles suggest that patients affected by COVID-19 frequently had concomitant chronic pathologies, especially hypertension and diabetes mellitus, pathologies that might be treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Fang et al. based their intriguing theory, of an increased risk of COVID-19 infection on patients treated with ACE inhibitors, on the relationship between the ACE system, which can be influenced by anti-inflammatory medicines, and the lung epithelial cells. Following this theory, their conclusion was the most obvious: “…patients …treated with ACE2-increasing drugs are at higher risk for severe COVID-19 infection…”. None of the quoted articles reporting the clinical experience in China has assessed the previous pharmacological therapy of the patients infected by COVID-19. In the last part of this recent article, the authors suggest that, based on a search on PubMed made on February 28, 2020, there are no reports on the potential influence of calcium channel blockers on ACE2 activity [2]. Therefore, these drugs could be used as an “alternative treatment in these patients”. Actually, nobody knows what the pharmacological therapy of the Chinese patients was. Maybe some of them were already using calcium antagonists. Hence, it seems that Fang et al.’s [2] theory is not related to what is reported in the two Chinese papers. Recently (March 9, 2020), I carried out a very thorough literature search for all the published material on COVID-19. None of the articles found on PubMed reports data connecting the use of ACE-inhibitors or NSAIDs to an increased incidence or risk of COVID-19 infection. I am not excluding that it might be shown in the future, when the literature will have more clear and valid scientific information, but at the moment it seems very premature. I think that, especially in a dramatic moment like the one we are living in, it would be more prudent to prevent the temptation to build castles in the air. To read more- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12325-020-01321-1


Useful information....

Cases that would interest you